<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RES PUBLICAE</title>
	<link>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog</link>
	<description>The South Carolina Estates Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 05:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Greenville Estate Attorney: &#8220;The Estate Tax Exemption to Become Portable?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/27/greenville-estate-attorney-the-estate-tax-exemption-to-become-portable/</link>
		<comments>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/27/greenville-estate-attorney-the-estate-tax-exemption-to-become-portable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher L. Miller</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/27/greenville-estate-attorney-the-estate-tax-exemption-to-become-portable/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lately I have found myself fascinated by the recent repeal of the federal estate tax and all of its consequences, intended or otherwise. Equally fascinating are the proposals that have been made by members of Congress to reinstate the estate tax.
One such proposal is to ressurect the estate tax for 2010 at 2009 levels, and to make the federal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lately I have found myself fascinated by the recent repeal of the federal estate tax and all of its consequences, intended or otherwise. Equally fascinating are the proposals that have been made by members of Congress to reinstate the estate tax.</p>
<p>One such proposal is to ressurect the estate tax for 2010 at 2009 levels, and to make the federal estate tax exemption portable between spouses. This is an interesting proposal in that theoretically this would eliminate the need for a credit shelter trust to accomplish estate tax planning for a married couple. In a typical planning scenario, the credit shelter trust is funded by assets owned by the first-to-die spouse and is funded up to the exemption amount, and all other assets are placed into a qualified terminable interest property (QTIP) trust for the sole benefit of the surviving spouse. This is done because if all the assets of the first-to-die spouse are transferred to the surviving spouse, the first-to-die spouse&#8217;s exemption amount is totally wasted, and a much larger estate tax becomes due at the end of the surviving spouse&#8217;s lifetime.     </p>
<p>The portability of the exemption would allow whatever exemption amount that is unused in the first-to-die spouse&#8217;s estate to be transferred to the surviving spouse&#8217;s estate.  Wouldn&#8217;t that be great? The proponents of portability say that this would eliminate the need for the credit shelter trust, thus reducing complexity and the financial burden of estate planning. Good intentions of course, but where again does that road paved with good intentions lead?</p>
<p>Experienced estate planners can instantly recognize the complexities that exemption portability would create.  Number one, what about multiple marriages?  <a href="http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/27/greenville-estate-attorney-the-estate-tax-exemption-to-become-portable/#more-86" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/27/greenville-estate-attorney-the-estate-tax-exemption-to-become-portable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greenville Estate Lawyer: &#8220;Court of Appeals Decides Constructive Trust Appeal&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/22/greenville-estate-lawyer-court-of-appeals-decides-constructive-trust-appeal/</link>
		<comments>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/22/greenville-estate-lawyer-court-of-appeals-decides-constructive-trust-appeal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 03:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher L. Miller</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[DIY Disasters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/22/greenville-estate-lawyer-court-of-appeals-decides-constructive-trust-appeal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In McDaniel v. Kendrick, Op. No. 4643 (S.C. Ct. App. filed December 31, 2009), the South Carolina Court of Appeals decided a real estate dispute with a tangential relationship to estate planning. Oftentimes, a mom or dad will decide as part of their estate planning to transfer a home to a child as a gift, with the expectation that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://www.judicial.state.sc.us/opinions/advSheets/no12010.pdf"><em>McDaniel v. Kendrick</em></a>, Op. No. 4643 (S.C. Ct. App. filed December 31, 2009), the South Carolina Court of Appeals decided a real estate dispute with a tangential relationship to estate planning. Oftentimes, a mom or dad will decide as part of their estate planning to transfer a home to a child as a gift, with the expectation that the parent would continue to reside in the home for the rest otheir lives. This might be done for medicaid qualification purposes (assuming medicaid is not expected to be necessary for at least five years), or estate tax purposes. What happens however is the relationship between parent and child or parent and spouse of child deteriorates, and the parent is evicted from the home.</p>
<p>There is an equitable legal doctrine known as a constructive trust that could come to the parent&#8217;s rescue in the above situation. While the <em>McDaniel</em> case did not concern a home transfer for the purpose of estate planning, it involved  <a href="http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/22/greenville-estate-lawyer-court-of-appeals-decides-constructive-trust-appeal/#more-85" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/22/greenville-estate-lawyer-court-of-appeals-decides-constructive-trust-appeal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congratulations to the Senator-Elect from Massachusetts</title>
		<link>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/20/congratulations-to-the-senator-elect-from-massachusetts/</link>
		<comments>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/20/congratulations-to-the-senator-elect-from-massachusetts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 02:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher L. Miller</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/20/congratulations-to-the-senator-elect-from-massachusetts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congratulations to Scott Brown, Esq., the new Senator-Elect for the State of Massachusetts.  By all accounts, Mr. Brown is a nice hard-working family lawyer turned politician who has an ability to connect with voters, and was willing to do the work in the trenches during the campaign to win the election. 
Knowing full well that I am being naive, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations to Scott Brown, Esq., the new Senator-Elect for the State of Massachusetts.  By all accounts, Mr. Brown is a nice hard-working family lawyer turned politician who has an ability to connect with voters, and was willing to do the work in the trenches during the campaign to win the election. </p>
<p>Knowing full well that I am being naive, somehow I hope that this election will bring some bipartisanship back to politics in D.C. The people&#8217;s business is important, from the health care reform bill to the inexplicably muddled state of the estate tax, to figuring out how to create an economic environment that gets people back to work. I hope the two parties can begin to work together again on these issues. But then again, I may have to rename this blog the South Carolina Naive Lawyer Blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/20/congratulations-to-the-senator-elect-from-massachusetts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greenville Estate Lawyer: &#8220;Beware the joint tenancy&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/19/greenville-estate-lawyer-beware-the-joint-tenancy/</link>
		<comments>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/19/greenville-estate-lawyer-beware-the-joint-tenancy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 02:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher L. Miller</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[DIY Disasters]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/19/greenville-estate-lawyer-beware-the-joint-tenancy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First installment of Do-it-Yourself estate planning disasters.  Client X has three children named High, Dry, and Helpful, and no surviving spouse. Helpful is so named because she is so very helpful in caring for mom. 
So helpful in fact, that Helpful moved in with mother a few years before mom&#8217;s death to take care of her, oh, and she
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First installment of Do-it-Yourself estate planning disasters.  Client X has three children named High, Dry, and Helpful, and no surviving spouse. Helpful is so named because she is so very helpful in caring for mom. </p>
<p>So helpful in fact, that Helpful moved in with mother a few years before mom&#8217;s death to take care of her, oh, and she  <a href="http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/19/greenville-estate-lawyer-beware-the-joint-tenancy/#more-82" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/19/greenville-estate-lawyer-beware-the-joint-tenancy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greenville Estate Attorney- &#8220;Let&#8217;s Discuss DIY Disasters&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/18/diy-disasters/</link>
		<comments>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/18/diy-disasters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher L. Miller</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[DIY Disasters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/18/diy-disasters/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a new blog category.  I am going to attempt to collect examples of Do-It-Yourself estate plans that have led to disastrous results. I think that the internet age has led to a boom for do-it-yourselfers in many fields, and this of course includes estate planning. With Google and Legal Zoom at your finger tips, what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a new blog category.  I am going to attempt to collect examples of Do-It-Yourself estate plans that have led to disastrous results. I think that the internet age has led to a boom for do-it-yourselfers in many fields, and this of course includes estate planning. With Google and Legal Zoom at your finger tips, what could possibly go wrong? My guess would be inadvertantly disinheriting loved ones and astronomical litigation fees, but let&#8217;s see if we can find out for sure. Stay tuned.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/18/diy-disasters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greenville Estate Lawyer: &#8220;For A New Year - Have Your Estate Plan Checked&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/18/greenville-estate-lawyer-for-a-new-year-have-your-estate-plan-checked/</link>
		<comments>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/18/greenville-estate-lawyer-for-a-new-year-have-your-estate-plan-checked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher L. Miller</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Faulty Estate Plans]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/18/greenville-estate-lawyer-for-a-new-year-have-your-estate-plan-checked/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have read any of my previous posts, surely you know that there is no federal estate tax in the year 2010.  Unsurprisingly, this change in the law can have severe repercussions for your estate plan.
Some estate planners are sounding the alarm with regard to estate plans based on credit shelter family trusts and marital deduction trusts.  These trusts are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have read any of my previous posts, surely you know that there is no federal estate tax in the year 2010.  Unsurprisingly, this change in the law can have severe repercussions for your estate plan.</p>
<p>Some estate planners are sounding the alarm with regard to estate plans based on credit shelter family trusts and marital deduction trusts.  These trusts are set up in such a way that the credit shelter trust gets funded with assets up to the amount that will not be subject to estate tax due to the previously existing estate tax exemption, while the marital deduction trust gets everything else.  (This set up eliminates all federal estate tax when the first spouse passes away.)</p>
<p>The problem with this set up is that  <a href="http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/18/greenville-estate-lawyer-for-a-new-year-have-your-estate-plan-checked/#more-80" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/18/greenville-estate-lawyer-for-a-new-year-have-your-estate-plan-checked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greenville Estate Lawyer: &#8220;&#8216;Tis the Season&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/16/2009-tax-season/</link>
		<comments>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/16/2009-tax-season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 03:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher L. Miller</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Hints]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/16/2009-tax-season/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 2009 tax season is fast approaching! It&#8217;s the year 2010. No federal estate tax! No generation skipping transfer tax! We think. Maybe. Maybe not. We&#8217;ll see. One thing that is certain is that there is a federal income tax this year. In honor of tax season, I have created a new blog category, where I will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2009 tax season is fast approaching! It&#8217;s the year 2010. No federal estate tax! No generation skipping transfer tax! We think. Maybe. Maybe not. We&#8217;ll see. One thing that is certain is that there is a federal income tax this year. In honor of tax season, I have created a new blog category, where I will provide some advice or hints on some common errors made in tax preparation. Quick post for now, til next time, &#8217;tis the season!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/01/16/2009-tax-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greenville Estate Lawyer:         &#8220;Unintended Consequences of Estate Tax Repeal&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/12/29/2010-estate-tax-repeal-unintended-consequences/</link>
		<comments>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/12/29/2010-estate-tax-repeal-unintended-consequences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher L. Miller</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/12/29/2010-estate-tax-repeal-unintended-consequences/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a prior post, I discussed the idea of stepped up tax basis, wherein upon death the tax basis of a person&#8217;s assets is set equal to the fair market value of the assets as of the date of death. Thus, if the asset is then sold after death for that same fair market value, there is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a prior <a href="http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/12/22/estate-tax-red-herring-2">post</a>, I discussed the idea of stepped up tax basis, wherein upon death the tax basis of a person&#8217;s assets is set equal to the fair market value of the assets as of the date of death. Thus, if the asset is then sold after death for that same fair market value, there is no taxable gain. </p>
<p>Alas, with the laws expected to go into effect in 2010, this will no longer be true.  In 2010, the estate tax is slated to be repealed.  Along with the estate tax, the law allowing for stepped up tax basis upon death is being partially repealed.  In 2009, all estate assets receive a stepped up basis.  However, in 2010 there will be a limited step up in basis only to the extent of $1.3 million in estate assets.  For transfers to spouses, there is an additional $3 million that will receive stepped up basis.  But what does this mean in reality? <a href="http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/12/29/2010-estate-tax-repeal-unintended-consequences/#more-78" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/12/29/2010-estate-tax-repeal-unintended-consequences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greenville Estate Lawyer: &#8220;Estate Tax Red Herring #2&#8243;</title>
		<link>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/12/22/estate-tax-red-herring-2/</link>
		<comments>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/12/22/estate-tax-red-herring-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher L. Miller</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/12/22/estate-tax-red-herring-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The next anti-estate tax argument that you may hear is that the estate tax taxes assets that have been taxed already. While this may be true in some instances, it is false when appreciated assets are considered.
To understand this requires attention to the interplay between income taxes and estate taxes.  For the rest of this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The next anti-estate tax argument that you may hear is that the estate tax taxes assets that have been taxed already. While this may be true in some instances, it is false when appreciated assets are considered.</p>
<p>To understand this requires attention to the interplay between income taxes and estate taxes.  For the rest of this discussion an equation must be remembered.  The equation is unrealized gain = current fair market value - tax basis.  Onward and upward to an example.</p>
<p>Assume &#8220;A&#8221; purchased a home in 1965 for a total purchase price of 100k. &#8220;A&#8221; passes away in 2009 and that house is now worth 4 million.  In this example &#8220;A&#8217;s&#8221; tax basis is the cost of acquiring the assets, or 100k, and &#8220;A&#8221; had an unrealized taxable gain of 3.9 million dollars that has never been subject to income tax. Under 2009 estate tax law, there will  <a href="http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/12/22/estate-tax-red-herring-2/#more-76" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/12/22/estate-tax-red-herring-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greenville Estate Lawyer: &#8220;No Movement By Senate on Estate Tax&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/12/19/no-movement-by-senate-on-estate-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/12/19/no-movement-by-senate-on-estate-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher L. Miller</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/12/19/no-movement-by-senate-on-estate-tax/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Senate has failed to make any move on estate tax legislation reinstating the federal estate tax for the year 2010. It is not expected to do so before the end of this year.
The sticking point seems to be that Republicans want a 5M dollar exemption and a thirty five percent highest tax bracket, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Senate has failed to make any move on estate tax legislation reinstating the federal estate tax for the year 2010. It is not expected to do so before the end of this year.</p>
<p>The sticking point seems to be that Republicans want a 5M dollar exemption and a thirty five percent highest tax bracket, while Democrats want to keep the current 3.5M dollar exemption and forty five percent rate.</p>
<p>It is reported by the Wall Street Journal that the Senate will revisit this issue early next year and enact retroactive legislation reinstating the estate tax as of January 1, 2010. As to what the parameters of that estate tax will be, you will just have to stay tuned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/12/19/no-movement-by-senate-on-estate-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
