South Carolina Trust and Estate Law Blog

By MillerLaw



South Carolina Trust
and Estate Law Blog

Greenville Attorney: “Estate tax debates scheduled for September 2010?”

August 28, 2010

It is reported that Senator Harry Reid had proposed debates to be held in September 2010 on the future of the federal estate tax.  It seems to me that the Democrats hold the leverage at this point, with the Republicans more inclined to give in on their side in order to avoid the automatic reinstatement of the federal estate tax at pre-EGTRRA levels, ie, a one million dollar exemption per estate with a maximum tax rate of 55%.  However, with the midterm election looming and uncertainty as to the future constituency of the Congress, I doubt that any actual legislation will be announced in September.    

President Obama’s 2011 proposed budget assumes that the estate tax law will include a three and a half million dollar exemption per estate with a maximum rate of 45%.  It will be interesting to see where the law stands on January 1, 2011.  I will post at midnight on January 1, 2011 to let you know.  Stay tuned….. 

Filed under: Legal Posts — Christopher Miller

Hey Greenville Estate Lawyer: Does my financial planner have a role to play in my estate planning?

August 27, 2010

Absolutely.  Your financial planner can play a role in your estate planning.  If your planner has recommended particular products to you, such as life insurance, annuities, or IRAs, consideration should be given to the effect that such assets can have on your estate plan, including your estate tax liability. Reviewing your estate before purchasing these products could best inform you of how to best structure these products to maximize estate tax savings or insure that your testamentary intentions are carried out fully.

However, there does seem to be some financial planners who do not entirely understand the attorney’s role in the estate planning process.  I have been contacted in the past by financial planners who tell me that they have a client who requires estate planning, that the planner has made recommendations to the client regarding estate planning, and that the planner simply wants to hire me to draft the documents that conform to his/her recommendations.  My policy has been to always refuse such offers. In my opinion, this sort of relationship between attorney and financial planner does a disservice to the client in that the client believes that they have had an attorney review their estate plan, and yet, the attorney has not given any sort of independent advice to the client.  This independent advice is crucial to the attorney-client relationship. 

Furthermore, such activity by a financial planner could be viewed as the unauthorized practice of law, with the attorney being accused of facilitating the unauthorized practice of law.  I have even had some financial planners say that all I will do is draft the documents, not even meet the clients.  This is fraught with danger to attorneys and their bar licenses.  There was a recent report from the Indiana State Bar of a suspension of 120 days being given to an attorney who drafted a Will intended to be signed by a person with whom the attorney never met.

There is a middle ground that must be found here. The financial planner wants to be a trusted long term adviser to his client, and may feel uncomfortable in turning the client over to an estate planning attorney.  However, the professional ethics of the attorney require that the attorney act as more than a mere scrivener to the financial planner.   

In all instances when I am referred a client by a financial planner, I discuss with the financial planner what are believed to be the estate planning issues to be dealt with. But I always thereafter meet with the client separately from the financial planner, so that the client can truly believe that the attorney they have hired is giving them independent and unbiased advice.

Here is an anecdote which I believe demonstrates the danger to any attorney who agrees to be employed as a financial planner’s scrivener.  Suppose a financial planner advises his client to make irrevocable transfers of assets to an irrevocable trust.  Suppose that an attorney then follows the financial planner’s directions, drafts the irrevocable trust, and then drafts the transfer documents. The financial planner then supervises the execution of the documents.  What could be the problem?  You did what the client wanted after all.  BUT, suppose five years down the line that client realizes that because of changed circumstances they need those assets back from the irrevocable trust?  That client will probably go to an attorney (not you because the client does not know who you are) and discuss with that new attorney ways to overturn the trust.  That new attorney will likely advise the client to petition to overturn the trust based on lack of adequate and independent legal representation. Do you as an attorney really want to testify at a deposition on the record that you drafted estate planning documents for people that you never met, that the non-attorney financial planner was calling all the shots, and that you exercised no independent judgment as to the propriety of the irrevocable transfers? That is not a position I ever want to be in.  All of my estate planning clients get the benefit of my independent and unbiased advice.  Any circumstances that arise that seek to alter this independence deserve increased scrutiny.

So what should you do if your financial planner makes estate planning recommendations to you? First, ask the financial planner if he has attorneys working in his company who can give independent estate planning advice.  If the answer is no, ask for recommendations for an estate planning attorney in the community, and then contact that attorney for an appointment.

Any financial planner that tells you that they can manage your investments and also draft the documents required to effectuate your estate plan without you having to ever visit an attorney is doing you a disservice.  The estate plan will be subject to an increased likelihood of being challenged and set aside by a court, and you will be denied the value of independent advice.             

Like any decent lawyer, I need to add a disclaimer here: unfortunately, it is impossible to offer comprehensive legal advice over the internet, no matter how well researched or written. And remember, reviewing this website and my blogs doesn’t make you a client of my Firm: before relying on any information given on this site, please contact a legal professional to discuss your particular situation.

Filed under: Estate Planning,Legal Posts — Christopher Miller